| Picture via The Wild WE |
On the flip-side Columbia College weekly hand-in's do count toward your grade and so if you are in the habit of not doing the work or submitting it late this can really damage the grade you walk away with. It also backs up the strict attendance rules because if you are not in class to hand in work it'll be a late hand-in and an absence.
But why is one going to be better than the other? Well speaking as a student I love that I can miss a class and still make up the work without it damaging my marks. Only a crazy person misses the final deadline so you can rest assured that as long as you turn in good work then, you should be okay. The down side with this is that as someone who struggles a little (read as a lot) with self-motivation and so once again the attendance issue rears it's ugly head. Is it too tempting to skip classes knowing that as long as you turn in a super essay it won't be such a problem. By having deadlines each week it assures that people who may have hidden behind the submissions of harder working (maybe more confident would be better?) cannot. Each person has to submit each week and it means they are constantly working to the ideas taught in the class that week. It also means that whoever is leading the class get's to see how people are improving on a week by week basis but can also spot bad habits before they get too ingrained. The downside here would be the sheer amount of work the class leader is then doing each week, especially for longer pieces of work. That said - whoever marks the 1000-2,500 (sometimes as much as 5000 for third years) suddenly has a huge workload in a smaller space of time.
Whether you are a student or a teacher I would be really interested to hear your thoughts on this, as I am un-decided, so please please please leave a comment!
Hi Hannah,
ReplyDeleteAfter having taught at Bath Spa University as well as my regular gig here at Columbia College Chicago, I have to say that I am a fan of the regular hand-in and the required attendance. With one huge hand-in (or perhaps two) and no required attendance, a student of considerable (or even questionable) talent could pass a class without even attending. In fact, I had a student who tried that in my class while I was at Bath. It was too her disadvantage, though, that we had done enough activities, exercises, discussions in class that she clearly missed that her final work was not particularly responsive to the assignment. She failed.
It is important to me to continuously assess a student's progress as I move through a semester, and for her as well. I don't read each week and write pages and pages of notes on a student's work (like I would for a final hand-in at Bath) but I read and try to talk with the student along the way to make sure we are on the same page about what is working, what needs work, what she might try next, etc. Grading, as you know, is holistic here at Columbia, and the overall progress can really only be determined if you have textual evidence in the form of regular hand-ins.
That's my two cents. Interesting two-sided argument here, Hannah.
Patty